Big Bang?


Well it appears that Scientists are having trouble solving the problem of fitting some new discoveries into the Billions of years timeline that they have so far agreed on. The Guardian Unlimited Is now reporting on a “radical new theory” that suggests that the universe is at least 986 billion years older than physicists thought and is probably much older than even that estimate.

In fact, even that monstrous number poses so many problems that, Prof Turok says “I think it is much more likely to be far older than a trillion years…… There doesn’t have to be a beginning of time. According to our theory, the universe may be infinitely old and infinitely large.”

So now we have a suggestion that it is actually “scientific” to think that something can exist with out a beginning, Wasn’t that one of the things that they laughed at creationists for saying, that God has always been here and will always be?
Just goes to show you the folly of trying to figure out a way to do something or a way that something happened without God.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Behind the scenes at Edwards!
Easter Sunday

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment, I'd love to hear what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!